​
​​Seeking Reliable and Unbiased Information
Commonly asked questions from key topics surrounding many aspects of the pandemic (including origins and mitigations) are presented below along with information resources in the form of reference materials such as relevant interviews, related articles and peer reviewed studies.





​
​
​​
Commonly Asked Questions with
​Information Resources & reference materials

sars-cov-2 ​& COVID-19

Who?
Despite their early involvement, we're not talking about the WHO (World Health Organization). This is the first of the 5 W's, Who. As in, Who first discovered the virus? It was Chinese Health Officials that investigated a surge of pneumonia with unknown etiology and first isolated this novel coronavirus.  Interestingly enough, China did inform the WHO of their investigation on December 31, 2019.
What?
SARS-CoV-2 (stands for: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2)
SARS-CoV-2 is a virus (a coronavirus to be specific) that causes respiratory illness in humans. This new coronavirus is similar to SARS-CoV, so it was named SARS-CoV-2.
​
COVID-19 (stands for: COronVIrusDisease-2019) 
COVID-19 is the disease caused by the virus, and was named according to the year that it was discovered (2019).
When?
The isolation of SARS-CoV-2 was achieved by China on January 7, 2020.
Additional dates of note:
Operation Dark Winter: June 22, 2001 – June 23, 2001
SARS-CoV Outbreak: February 2003
US CDC Patents Coronavirus: Filed April 12, 2004 - Awarded May 22, 2007
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development: May 2010
​Event 201: October 18, 2019

Dr David Martin | Dr Reiner Fuellmich - July 9, 2021

This is a lengthy but informative discussion between Dr. David Martin and Dr. Reiner Fuellmich et al. regarding the origins of the Coronavirus, with much emphasis on patent applications and awards, along with key dates associated with the filings. An extensive report authored by Dr. Martin is linked here.
URL: https://www.davidmartin.world/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf
Where?
The initial COVID-19 outbreak was in Wuhan, China, and despite highly publicized containment efforts the initially localized outbreak quickly became a Worldwide Pandemic.
Why?
Is this THE Question of the Hour, Day, Week, Month, Year, Decade, Century, Millennium? It certainly seems to be the question of a generation.

Was there some underlying plan or agenda? Were there powerful figures and factions that exerted their authority to implement their grand scheme, or were these powerful figures and factions waiting in the wings for an opportune moment to implement and promote their agenda(s)?

Was is Murphy's Law in action? Was this virus an inevitable natural occurrence? Was is an accidental release from lab experiments?

Explore the links provided in the timeline presented above along with the links to articles below, and form your own conclusion(s).
How?
Was it Gain of Function Research? Did it come from Animals? Did it originate in the Huanan Seafood marketplace? There are many questions surrounding the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and there is much information surrounding the topic of origination. Links to sources exploring this very topic are included below for reference.

The Science Suggests a Wuhan Lab Leak

June 6, 2021 by Steven Quay and Richard Muller at the Wall Street Journal

Gain-Of-Function Advocate’s Partner Serves On Lancet’s COVID-19 Committee​

June 29, 2021 by Natalie Winters

Explosive Report: U.S. Government Deleted COVID Data at Request of Chinese Researchers

June 27, 2021 by Kyle Becker
Can We Trust the Fact Checkers?
We'd certainly like to think so, wouldn't we? But is there truly a scientific consensus among experts? Are there connections between our technology and pharmaceutical empires?

​Let's explore this question a little deeper, shall we?

Covid-19: Who fact checks health and science on Facebook?

May 25, 2021 by Laurie Clarke, freelance journalist at thebmj

How Facebook's 'independent fact checkers' cited letter secretly organized by Wuhan lab funder Peter Daszak to 'debunk' leak theory and punish news outlets that explored it​

June 5, 2021 by Keith Griffith for DAILYMAIL.COM

REVEALED: Google & USAID Funded Wuhan Collaborator Peter Daszak’s Virus Experiments For Over A Decade​

June 19, 2021 by Natalie Winters for The National Pulse.
Our original source for the three links presented above was The Highwire: https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-fauci-files/​
What Does the Co-founder of Wikipedia Have to Say?

Wikipedia co-founder: I no longer trust the website I created​

Unherd via YouTube

Freddie Sayers meets Larry Sanger.

Listen to the podcast version: https://shows.acast.com/lockdowntv-wi...

Read the full article here: https://unherd.com/thepost/wikipedia-...



​
Chances are, if you’ve ever been on the internet, you’ve visited Wikipedia. It is the world’s fifth largest website, pulling in an estimated 6.1 billion followers per month and serves as a cheat sheet for almost any topic in the world. So great is the online encyclopedia's influence is so great that it is the biggest and “most read reference work in history”, with as many as 56 million editions.

But the truth about this supposedly neutral purveyor of information is a little more complex. Historically, Wikipedia has been written and monitored by a community of volunteers who collaborated and contested competing claims with one another. In the words of Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger who spoke to Freddie Sayers on LockdownTV, these volunteers would “battle it out”.

​This battle of ideas on Wikipedia’s platform formed a crucial part of the encyclopedia's commitment to neutrality, which according to Sanger, was abandoned after 2009. In the years since, on issues ranging from Covid to Joe Biden, it has become increasingly partisan, primarily espousing an establishment viewpoint that increasingly represents "propaganda". This, says Sanger, is why he left the site in 2007, describing it as “broken beyond repair”.

COVID-19 Testing

What are the Different Types of Testing?
Molecular (examples: PCR, RT-PCR, qPCR and RT-qPCR Tests)
  • PCR Test: This tests for the presence of the actual virus’s genetic material or its fragments as it breaks down. ​
Antigen (example: Rapid Test)
  • ​Antigen Test: This test detects bits of proteins on the surface of the virus called antigens. Antigen tests are typically considered rapid, taking only 15 to 30 minutes but are less accurate than a PCR test. Rapid antigen tests are most accurate when used within a few days of the start of your symptoms, which is when the largest amount of virus is present in your body.
Serology (example: Antibody Test) 
  • Antibody Test: This tests detects if you’ve had an immune response (antibodies) to the virus. This means that you’ve had the virus and your body (immune system, specifically antibodies) has mounted an attack to fight it. The test is detecting those antibodies. It typically takes about a week after being infected for enough antibodies to develop to be detected in your blood. For this reason, this test shouldn’t be used to diagnose an active infection.
What is RT-PCR Testing?
From: Understanding cycle threshold (Ct) in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR: a guide for health protection teams via GOV.UK

​Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), also referred to as real-time reverse transcription (rRT), is an established laboratory technique that can be used to identify the presence of specific genetic material through a biochemical process of amplification using enzymes and is based on specific target recognition. Genetic material includes DNA and RNA, but in the context of RT-PCR it is RNA that is detected. SARS-CoV-2 has an RNA genome. The major benefits of RT-PCR are in the ability to detect extremely small amounts of pathogen RNA in a very short time. RT-PCR has therefore revolutionized the speed and sensitivity of clinical diagnostics and can be adapted to test at large throughput using automation with reduced need for technical expertise. Modern applications of RT-PCR allow the reaction to be monitored during each stage, known as real time RT-PCR.
Here is an additional related comprehensive and informative resource with references and links to sources:
COVID-19: Following the Science Part II - PCR and the Misuse of Science
Including an examination of psychological and behavioral tools being used throughout the declared health crisis
January 2021
And embedded below is a podcast by No New Abnormal discussing some details of RT-PCR:
How is RT-PCR Performed?
From: Understanding cycle threshold (Ct) in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR: a guide for health protection teams via GOV.UK

​Often heralded as one of the most important scientific advances in molecular biology, PCR revolutionized the study of DNA to such an extent that its creator, Kary B. Mullis, was awarded the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1993. The first step in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR is to extract the viral RNA from the sample to purify, stabilize and concentrate it, to increase detection of samples containing low quantity of virus.
The purified extract is added to a biochemical reaction mixture that includes:
  • primers – short stretches of nucleic acid that match parts of the target organism genome
  • nucleotide bases (the building blocks of nucleic acids)
  • enzymes to initiate and complete the reaction
  • fluorescently labelled probes – short stretches of nucleic acid that recognize and stick to the reaction product (the reaction indicator)
Primers attach to target regions of the viral nucleic acid, allowing the enzyme to add nucleotides to elongate a complementary DNA (cDNA) strand. The sample reaction mixture is subjected to repeated thermal cycles so that copies of the viral target are doubled per cycle leading to exponential rise. Labelled probes emit a fluorescent signal in the presence of newly synthesized target. The earlier that exponential increase occurs, the higher the quantity of virus in the sample.
What does Ct mean as it pertains to RT-PCR Testing?
From: Understanding cycle threshold (Ct) in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR: a guide for health protection teams via GOV.UK

Ct stands for Cycle threshold, and Cycle threshold (Ct) is a semi-quantitative value that can broadly categorize the concentration of viral genetic material in a patient sample following testing by RT PCR as low, medium or high – that is, it tells us approximately how much viral genetic material is in the sample.

A low Ct indicates a high concentration of viral genetic material, which is typically associated with high risk of infectivity.

A high Ct indicates a low concentration of viral genetic material which is typically associated with a lower risk of infectivity. In the context of an upper respiratory tract sample a high Ct may also represent scenarios where a higher risk of infection remains – for example, early infection, inadequately collected or degraded sample.

A single Ct value in the absence of clinical context cannot be relied upon for decision making about a person’s infectivity.
​
Ct values cannot be directly compared between assays of different types – not all laboratories use the same assay, and some may use more than one.

From: Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020 via ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

As Ct value increases, infectiousness decreases.
From: COVID-19 Cycle Threshold Values via Yale School of Medicine by Marie L. Landry, M.D.

The cycle of amplification that the fluorescence crosses the threshold to positive. The Ct value correlates with viral load. A lower Ct value indicates a higher viral load in the sample, and vice versa.

PCR commonly uses 40 cycles of amplification, and each cycle doubles the target DNA. 3.3 cycles = a 10-fold change.

In Real-time PCR, a fluorescence signal emitted during amplification can be seen “in real time”, and can provide Ct values.

The reference above states that 3.3 cycles = a 10-fold change, which correlates with the fact that every cycle doubles the amplification. To validate and illustrate the amplification based on the Ct value, please see the table below.​

Other Key Points raised by Dr. Marie L. Landry (Yale School of Medicine):
  • Standard tests diagnose large numbers of people carrying insignificant amounts of virus.
  • Most are not likely to be contagious. If Ct >33, virus not grown in culture.
  • A cycle threshold >35 is too sensitive.
  • A more reasonable cutoff is Ct 30-35 or even Ct <30.
  • In NY state lab, 50% of recent positives had Ct >35.
  • In MA, 85-90% of positives in July had Ct >30.
  • Cycle threshold is never included in the results sent to clinicians.
  • ​For outbreak tracing, cheap and abundant rapid tests are needed, even if less sensitive​
Evidence of higher Ct being utilized by Yale New Haven Hospital in the US:
Evidence of higher Ct being utilized by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust in the UK:
What are the Supposed Experts Saying?
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) in conjunction with the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) have recently released the IDSA and AMP joint statement on the use of SARS-CoV-2 PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values for clinical decision-making.

This joint statement from IDSA and AMP is a great source of uncertainty. Pay very close attention to the uncertain wording that we've highlighted in this document such as:
"definitive data are...lacking"
"do not reliably correspond"
"are not consistent"
"do not routinely include"
"caveats...need to be considered", etc.

​Are we effectively 'flying by the seat of our pants' with RT-PCR testing?

Moreover, IDSA & AMP point out the inconsistencies between different PCR tests & laboratories, as well as the collection process.

​There's even an entire table of factors impacting Ct values presented.

​Why should we trust PCR tests if we cannot reliably interpret the results?

There are even large inconsistencies between evaluation of data among leading government agencies like CNML & USCDC.

​Because of the limits in data availability and retention, and due to the possibility of drawing inaccurate conclusions, the IDSA and AMP are advising caution be used in publishing Ct values and/or using Ct values to inform clinical decision making.

​If the ISDA & AMP cannot advise decision making based on Ct values from RT-PCR testing, then how can we implement RT-PCR testing as the "gold standard"?
A Word of Caution From the PCR Inventor
​Nobel Laureate and PCR Inventor, Kary Mullis is quoted saying: “The PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody,” Mullis once said. “If you can amplify one single molecule up to something you can really measure, which is something you can do. So that could be thought of as a misuse of it.”

EARLY TREATMENTS & Preventative Measures

Are There Effective Early Treatments for COVID-19?
This is a good question, and one that appears to be actively suppressed by the mainstream media (MSM) outlets and other general communications to the public. The information provided below gives crucial information regarding the topic of early treatment and preventative measures.

Presentation by Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

Covexit News and Analysis via YouTube

In this presentation, Professor and Dr. Peter McCullough provides an update about best practices for early outpatient treatment, on the basis of 2 major publications of which he was the lead author, and more recent information from the latest research and practical experience of MDs treating outpatients for C19.

Presentation also located ​here.

Peter McCullough, MD testifies to Texas Senate ​HHS Committee

Picture
Visit the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons to learn more about these effective COVID-19 Treatment Protocols.

​Testimony given March 10, 2021

Dr. Peter McCollough, MD speaks about his involvement in the development and publishing of effective COVID-19 treatment protocols. He also discusses the efficacy of these treatments, and questions the lack of acknowledgement of these successful COVID-19 treatments.

FLCCC Alliance testifies to senate committee

The Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance has now developed a prophylactic and early outpatient combination treatment protocol for COVID-19 called I-Mask+. This protocol is centered around the use of Ivermectin, a well-known anti-parasite drug with recently discovered anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties and a rapidly growing published medical evidence base demonstrating its unique and highly potent ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication.

Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance
Prevention & Treatment Protocols for COVID-19

Pierre Kory on Twitter @PierreKory

HOMELAND SECURITY COMMITTEE MEETING: FOCUS ON EARLY TREATMENT OF COVID-19
​TESTIMONY OF PIERRE KORY, MD

December 8, 2020​

interview of Dr. Pierre Kory by Dr. mobeen syed

Drbeen Medical Lectures via YouTube

Dr. Pierre Kory, Ivermectin (Let’s help end the pandemic.)

Dr. Kory gained international fame when he went to the US senate and asked for the approval for the Ivermectin for COVID. Since then, INH has changed their position from against Ivermectin to neither against and nor pro Ivermectin - a neutral position is still a better position to allow physicians to use it without fear. Similarly WHO has started reviewing Ivermectin’s efficacy for COVID as well. Gates foundation has started trials too to vet out the efficacy of Ivermectin.
Why are Potential Treatments Falling by the Wayside?
This question is self explanatory, and one that many are asking. Find relevant information and discussion below.

Censorship of medical information and intellectual authoritarianism (Pierre Kory & Bret Weinstein)

Clip from Bret Weinstein and Pierre Kory on DarkHorse

CENSORED on YouTube

​available on Spotify or here: https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/C...

On this very special live broadcast of the DarkHorse podcast, Dr. Bret Weinstein (Ph.D) and Dr. Pierre Kory (M.D.) will discuss the ongoing pandemic, the care of COVID-19 patients, and the incredible story of Ivermectin.
Mentioned in the full episode:

British Ivermectin Recommendation Development group: https://bird-group.org

The BIRD Recommendation on the Use of Ivermectin for Covid-19: Executive Summary: https://bird-group.org/wp-content/upl...

Carvallo et al 2020. Study of the efficacy and safety of topical ivermectin+ iota-carrageenan in the prophylaxis against COVID-19 in health personnel. J. Biomed. Res. Clin. Investig., 2. https://medicalpressopenaccess.com/up...

Cobos-Campos et al 2021.Potential use of ivermectin for the treatment and prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Efficacy of ivermectin for SARS-CoV-2. Clin Res Trials, 7: 1-5. https://www.readkong.com/page/potenti...

Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 93 studies, 55 peer reviewed, 56 with results comparing treatment and control groups: https://c19ivermectin.com

Karale et al 2021. A Meta-analysis of Mortality, Need for ICU admission, Use of Mechanical Ventilation and Adverse Effects with Ivermectin Use in COVID-19 Patients. medRxiv. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrx...

Kory et al 2021. Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19. American Journal of Therapeutics, 28(3): e299: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...

Nardelli et al 2021. Crying wolf in time of Corona: the strange case of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Is the fear of failure withholding potential life-saving treatment from clinical use?. Signa Vitae, 1: 2. https://oss.signavitae.com/mre-signav...

​Yagisawa et al 2021. Global trends in clinical studies of ivermectin in COVID-19. The Japanese Journal of Antibiotics, 74: 1. https://www.psychoactif.org/forum/upl...

Vaccine "Emergency Use Authorization" & ivermectin

A clip with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying.
References:
FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization Guidelines: https://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download

Bannister, A. 2021. Don’t mention Ivermectin; it’ll upset the vaccine rollout. BizNews, May 12, 2021: https://www.biznews.com/thought-leade...

Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic, February 4, 2021: https://www.merck.com/news/merck-stat...

No evidence ivermectin is a miracle drug against COVID-19 – fact-checking by the AP on December 11, 2020: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check...

Dr. Pierre Kory testifies before the Senate, December 15, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28YV8... 

Heather Heying on Twitter @HeatherEHeying
Bret Weinstein on Twitter @BretWeinstein

COVID-19 VACCINES

What are these New Vaccine Technologies?
mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines (examples: Pfizer, Moderna)
COVID-19 mRNA vaccines give instructions via Messenger RNA for our cells to make what is called the “spike protein.” The spike protein is found on the surface of the virus that causes COVID-19.

Viral Vector COVID-19 Vaccines (examples: Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca)
COVID-19 viral vector vaccines use a modified version of a different virus (the vector) to deliver important instructions to our cells. These viral vectors are made by taking a piece of DNA from the COVID-19 spike protein and combining it with an adenovirus, a type of virus typically involved in a common cold.

"We are not dealing with Classic vaccines... we are dealing with vaccines that are actually extremely novel." ​-Bret Weinstein

"These (new vaccine technologies) are things that if we can potentially figure out how to do this well and safely are potentially a huge boon to humanity, but at the moment we're dealing with brand new technologies. And they are brand new technologies that have in multiples ways shown themselves not to function the way their designers had intended."​
​-Bret Weinstein

  • "The vaccines don't stay at the injection site in the way they are hoped"
  • "The spike protein on which they are based is toxic."
  • ​"The spike protein which was modified, which was designed by those who made the vaccines, to stick in the cell membrane and to remain there for the immune system to see it and respond to it, in many cases breaks free and floats around the body."
​-Bret Weinstein
And with regard to a recent article published by nature.com on July 9, 2021 titled Quarter-dose of Moderna COVID vaccine still rouses a big immune response:
  • ​"To whatever extent there might be risk involved with the vaccine, potentially it could have been greatly reduced by just diminishing the amount of the active ingredients."​​​​
​-Bret Weinstein
A Word From the Inventor of the mRNA Gene Therapy

Dr. Robert W. Malone | The Inventor of mRNA Vaccines Speaks Out

The Ripple Effect Podcast with Ricky Varandas

Dr. Robert W. Malone is the inventor of the mRNA vaccines, DNA vaccine technology, and RNA as a drug. Dr. Malone has close to 100 peer-reviewed publications, has over 11,477 citations of his peer reviewed publications, has been an invited speaker at over 50 conferences, has chaired numerous conferences and he has sat on or served as chairperson on numerous NIAID and DoD study sections. Dr. Malone has an amazing resume, and should be considered one of the most creditable & respected voices in regards to the mRNA tech used in the COVID vaccines, and instead, Dr. Malone has been censored & suppressed on many platforms.​
Are these New Vaccine Technologies Above Reproach?

​​Heart Inflammation Linked to COVID Vaccines in Study of U.S. Military, Department of Defense Confirms

June 30, 2021 by Megan Redshaw

First Autopsy of COVID Vaccinated Patient Finds Every Organ of Body Infested with Spike Proteins

June 14, 2021 by EU Times

Spike protein is very dangerous, it's cytotoxic (Robert Malone, Steve Kirsch, Bret Weinstein)

Spike protein is very dangerous, it's cytotoxic. Clip from DarkHorse podcast. Full livestream now CENSORED on YouTube. Odysee for backup: https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/h...

Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology. Mr. Steve Kirsch is a serial entrepreneur who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID vaccines.

Bret talks to Robert and Steve about the pandemic, treatment and the COVID vaccines.
Steve's paper on COVID vaccine reactions: https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-...
Steve's Twitter: https://twitter.com/stkirsch
COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund: https://www.treatearly.org/team/steve...

Dr. Malone's website: https://www.rwmalonemd.com/mrna-vacci...
Robert's LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rwmalonemd
​Robert's Twitter: https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD

Prof. Dr. med. Luc Montagnier Full Interview June 2021

This is an interview of Nobel Laureate Dr. Luc Montagnier conducted by members of the German Corona Investigative Committee consisting of German Attorney Viviane Fischer, German Physician Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, and German Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich.

dr. Bret Weinstein's Interview of dr. geert vanden bossch

Geert Vanden Bossche is a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine who has specialist expertise in virology and vaccinology, Geert has worked in industry in the construction of vaccines, and in the non profit sector working to bring immunity to larger numbers of people.

Geert Vanden Bossche on Twitter @GVDBossche

Bret Weinstein on Twitter @BretWeinstein

presentation by Geert Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD

Covexit News and Analysis via YouTube

This is the presentation by Geert Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD about the risk of “viral escape” posed by “leaky vaccines.”

The theoretical article he is referring to is: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology...

You can find many more info and references on his website: https://www.geertvandenbossche.org/

Presentation also located here​.​
Are We Starting to See the Real Numbers Emerge?

REPORT: Number of People Vaccinated May be Overcounted by Millions

July 13, 2021 by Daily Veracity
Vaccine Passports Could Never Become a Reality, Could They?
​The ultimate violation of civil liberty would be to take away the peoples' right to medical autonomy. Rumblings of vaccine passports sounds like something straight out of a fictitious dystopian future, but could it become reality? Unfortunately, vaccine passports are upon us.

Coming Soon to a State Near You!

California, NYC to require employees to get COVID-19 vaccine

July 26, 2021 by Philip Marcelo for the Associated Press

VA requires COVID-19 vaccination for health care workers

July 26, 2021 by Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar for the Associated Press
​Unfortunately, this topic has found its way directly into our lives here at ABOUT FACE. Presented below is a redacted version of a survey that was directly received from one of our employers. Vaccine Passports are very real, and they are going to be pushed by the private industry as well as government entities. Visit our LEGAL ACTION page to learn more about our options.
Why is there So Much Collusion & Coercion Surrounding This Vaccine?

Vaccine side effects are not required to be reported by OSHA, but why the deviation from federal regulation?

Clip with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying.

Reference: https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs...

NOTE: This is a reupload where part of the clip has been cut because the adverse reactions peer-reviewed paper in the original upload does not seem to be accurate. We deleted this old section in under 9 hours (much faster than corporate media).

Heather Heying on Twitter @HeatherEHeying

Bret Weinstein on Twitter @BretWeinstein

Dr. Peter McCullough on with Reiner Fuelmich June 11, 2021

Professor and Dr. Peter McCullough provides an update to German Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich et al. on natural infection, treatments, and the supercharged vaccination campaign. What does it all mean?

We are working to find a new source for this podcast, but in the meantime here is a link to the AUDIO version.

Natural Infection vs. Vaccination

What Does it Mean to Have Natural Immunity & How Does it Compare to Vaccination?
With each new study that's published, Naturally Acquired Immunity to COVID-19 continues to exceed Vaccine Immunity by larger and larger margins. We're now seeing evidence that protection from COVID-19 by Naturally Acquired Immunity is 27 times greater than by vaccination!

Harvard Epidemiologist Says the Case for COVID Vaccine Passports Was Just Demolished​

New research found that natural immunity offers exponentially more protection than COVID-19 vaccines.
August 30, 2021 by Jon Miltimore
​for FEE

Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection?​

Nearly 40% of new COVID patients were vaccinated - compared to just 1% who had been infected previously.
July 13, 2021 by David Rosenberg
​for Israel National News
"Coronavirus patients who recovered from the virus were far less likely to become infected during the latest wave of the pandemic than people who were vaccinated against COVID, according to numbers presented to the Israeli Health Ministry.

Health Ministry data on the wave of COVID outbreaks which began this May show that Israelis with immunity from natural infection were far less likely to become infected again in comparison to Israelis who only had immunity via vaccination.

More than 7,700 new cases of the virus have been detected during the most recent wave starting in May, but just 72 of the confirmed cases were reported in people who were known to have been infected previously – that is, less than 1% of the new cases.

Roughly 40% of new cases – or more than 3,000 patients – involved people who had been infected despite being vaccinated.

With a total of 835,792 Israelis known to have recovered from the virus, the 72 instances of reinfection amount to 0.0086% of people who were already infected with COVID.

By contrast, Israelis who were vaccinated were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection, with over 3,000 of the 5,193,499, or 0.0578%, of Israelis who were vaccinated getting infected in the latest wave.

According to a report by Channel 13, the disparity has confounded – and divided – Health Ministry experts, with some saying the data proves the higher level of immunity provided by natural infection versus vaccination, while others remained unconvinced."

LOCKDOWNS

Are Lockdowns Constitutional?

Spain’s top court rules pandemic lockdown unconstitutional

July 14, 2021 by Joseph Wilson for the Associated Press

Efficacy of MASKS

What Effects Do Masks Have on Children?

Impact of masks on children

A clip with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying.
Clip taken from DarkHorse Podcast Livestream #85 (originally streamed live on June 26, 2021): https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/E...

Q&A: https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/E...

​What is this a clip from?
​In this 85th in a series of live discussions with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying (both PhDs in Biology), discuss the state of the world though an evolutionary lens. Find more from us on Bret’s website (https://bretweinstein.net) or Heather’s website (http://heatherheying.com).

Heather Heying on Twitter @HeatherEHeying
Bret Weinstein on Twitter @BretWeinstein

Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children

A Randomized Clinical Trial
Harald Walach, PhD; Ronald Weikl, MD; Juliane Prentice, BA; et al
Here's an explanation of this first Randomized Control Trial of it's kind from Ivor Cummins.

FINALLY a Clinical Trial on Facemasks in Children - Parents Take Note!

Ivor Cummins via YouTube

NON-CENSORABLE as this is a simple summary of study * just published in the Journal of the American Medical Association - JAMA * ALL Parents should be aware of the emerging science - their kids are THEIR responsibility.

Download the vid here: https://we.tl/t-nPkQHzkh5T